Capstick, S. et al. in Emission Gap Report 2020 Ch. 6 (UNEP, 2020).
van Vuuren, DP et al. Alternative pathways to the 1.5 ° C target reduce the need for negative emission technologies. Nat. Clim. Change 8391–397 (2018).
Ajzen, I. The theory of planned behavior. Organ. Behav. Hum. Decis. Process. 50179-211 (1991).
Stern, PC, Dietz, T., Abel, T., Guagnano, GA & Kalof, L. A value – belief – norm theory of support for social movements: the case of environmentalism. Hum. Ecol. Rev. 681–97 (1999).
Klöckner, CA A comprehensive model of the psychology of environmental behavior — a meta-analysis. Glob. Environ. Change 231028-1038 (2013).
Klöckner, CA & Blöbaum, A. A comprehensive action determination model: toward a broader understanding of ecological behavior using the example of travel mode choice. J. Environ. Psychol. 30574–586 (2010).
Nielsen, KS, Cologna, V., Lange, F., Brick, C. & Stern, PC The case for impact-focused environmental psychology. J. Environ. Psychol. 74101559 (2021).
Kaiser, FG & Wilson, M. Goal-directed conservation behavior: the specific composition of a general performance. Pers. Individ. Differ. 361531–1544 (2004).
Brick, C., Sherman, DK & Kim, HS “Green to be seen” and “brown to keep down”: visibility moderates the effect of identity on pro-environmental behavior. J. Environ. Psychol. 51226-238 (2017).
Dietz, T., Gardner, GT, Gilligan, J., Stern, PC & Vandenbergh, MP Household actions can provide a behavioral wedge to rapidly reduce US carbon emissions. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 10618452–18456 (2009).
Allen, S., Dietz, T. & Mccright, AM Measuring household energy efficiency behaviors with attention to behavioral plasticity in the United States. Energy Res. Soc. Sci. 10133–140 (2015).
Kim, H.-S. & Damhorst, ML Environmental concern and apparel consumption. Cloth. Text. Res. J. 16126–133 (1998).
Bleys, B., Defloor, B., Van Ootegem, L. & Verhofstadt, E. The environmental impact of individual behavior: self-assessment versus the ecological footprint. Environ. Behav. 50187–212 (2018).
Kennedy, EH et al. Are we counting what counts? A closer look at environmental concern, pro-environmental behavior, and carbon footprint. Local Environ. 20220–236 (2015).
Moser, S. & Kleinhückelkotten, S. Good intents, but low impacts: diverging importance of motivational and socioeconomic determinants explaining behavior, energy use, and carbon footprint. Environ. Behav. 6626–656 (2018).
Ivanova, D. et al. Quantifying the potential for climate change mitigation of consumption options. Environ. Res. Lett. 15093001 (2020).
Peters, G., Li, M. & Lenzen, M. The need to decelerate fast fashion in a hot climate — a global sustainability perspective on the garment industry. J. Clean. Prod. 295126390 (2021).
Niinimäki, K. et al. The environmental price of fast fashion. Nat. Rev. Earth Environ. 1189–200 (2020).
Kraha, A., Turner, H., Nimon, K., Zientek, LR & Henson, RK Tools to support interpreting multiple regression in the face of multicollinearity. Front. Psychol. 344 (2012).
Gwozdz, W., Nielsen, KS & Müller, T. An environmental perspective on clothing consumption: consumer segments and their behavioral patterns. Sustainability 9762 (2017).
Sohn, J., Nielsen, KS, Birkved, M., Joanes, T. & Gwozdz, W. The environmental impacts of clothing: evidence from United States and three European countries. Sustain. Prod. Consum. 272153-2164 (2021).
Nielsen, KS From prediction to process: a self-regulation account of environmental behavior change. J. Environ. Psychol. 51189–198 (2017).
Roos, S., Sandin, G., Zamani, B., Peters, G. & Svanström, M. in Textiles and Clothing Sustainability (ed. Muthu, SS) 1–45 (Springer, 2017).
A New Textiles Economy: Redesigning Fashion’s Future (Ellen MacArthur Foundation, 2017); https://ellenmacarthurfoundation.org/a-new-textiles-economy
R Core Team A: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing (R Foundation for Statistical Computing, 2012); https://www.r-project.org/
Behrendt, S. Lm.beta: Add Standardized Regression Coefficients to lm-Objects. R package version 1.5-1 https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/lm.beta/lm.beta.pdf (2014).
Joanes, T. Personal norms in a globalized world: norm-activation processes and reduced clothing consumption. J. Clean. Prod. 212941–949 (2019).
Joanes, T., Gwozdz, W. & Klöckner, CA Reducing personal clothing consumption: a cross-cultural validation of the comprehensive action determination model. J. Environ. Psychol. 71101396 (2020).
Nielsen, KS, Gwozdz, W. & De Ridder, D. Unraveling the relationship between trait self-control and subjective well-being: the mediating role of four self-control strategies. Front. Psychol. 10706 (2019).
Nielsen, KS, Bauer, JM & Hofmann, W. Examining the relationship between trait self-control and stress: evidence on generalizability and outcome variability. J. Res. Pers. 84103901 (2020).
Nielsen, KS & Bauer, JM The merits of goal support as a self-control strategy. Soc. Psychol. Personal. Ski. 10671–680 (2019).